Subscribe to Insight-Live.com. It is about DIY testing, recipe & photo management, glaze chem and managing all the data.
Help Me on Social
Tony Hansen
Follow me on
Login to your account
Chemistry plus physics.
Maintain your recipes, test results, firing schedules, pictures, materials, projects, etc.
Access your data from any connected device. Import desktop Insight data (and of other products).
Group accounts for industry and education. Private accounts for potters.
Get started.
Download for Mac, PC, Linux
Interactive glaze chemistry for the desktop. Free (no longer in development but still maintained, M1 Mac version now available).
Download here or in the Files panel within your Insight-live.com account.
What people have said about Digitalfire
I have the downloaded version of The Magic of Fire for several years now and find it excellent. I'm now ready to purchase level 2 of Insight. Your resources are truly amazing and as an ex electronic engineer (now a potter), I really am impressed with your analytical approaches. Your site is almost a complete college level course on pottery (less the throwing & handbuilding).
However, I must add that it would be well worth it--the Magic of Fire is one of the best-written books I've read! I must admit, it's the first technical manual to keep me up 'til 3 a.m. because I just couldn't put it down...
In fact, it has inspired a bit of a revolution in my small corner of the world... you see, I am one of those dreaded hobby ceramicists (well, actually, I cast cute kittens and ducks and what-have-yous for a ceramics store in Dallas, Tx), and I often have customers ask advice regarding firing, pouring molds, etc., and since I've been reading your book, I've been able to provide MUCH better answers... and I've often referred them to the book directly when they seem so inclined.
I am beginning to have a hope that more hobby amateurs will take an interest in the whys and wherefores instead of the hit-or-miss-and-hope-like-hell method so prevalent in this side of the ceramics industry.
When my group of potters are pressed to improve our glazes they say if the old way is not broken yet why don't you buy yourself some kind of a kit to play with new glazes and then we can make it for everyone. You got to be kidding I say to myself. Anyway, your website will help me help the group out of some old and boring glazes if I can see forward enough. Thanks for all this important info, I can't believe this website is here!
I must say that your article on geting pink colors from Chrome and Tin had an appealing writing style and was very informative.
You have such a goldmine of information available on your Digitalfire website and I am asking your permission to, not only use some of it, but to direct the students to your website for more info than I could ever convey.
Your web site is amazing, the information I have learnt is so exciting. So thank you for your hard work to put it all together.
Thanks for your website! I found it greatly informative and useful in my research work on high temperature ceramic materials.
After perusing your site for some time, I am really getting the sense of what a valuable resource it is. Thank you for it.
I've become fascinated with Glaze chemistry in the last year or so, have purchased your book, and refer to your site from time to time as well...What a great resource! I have read your book a couple of times, but have not completely digested all of it. I suspect it takes most folks quite a bit of time!
I always visit this site, found very helpful to make my own ceramic composition and now I need your software to use for advanced ceramic.
What people have said about Insight-Live
Thank you for all of the information you publish on your website. Digitalfire has been my primary resource for researching raw materials and I will be soon be subscribing to Insight. Thank you so much for all of your work. My fellow students and I refer to your website almost daily.
Thanks for sharing your extensive knowlege with the clay community.
I read your articles for years, and it really helped me to better understand ceramics.
Thank you for everything you do online, I've learned a lot from your blog and continue to do so (I'm an art school graduate and in spite of our curriculum having included a glaze chemistry course, our professors lacked an industry background, which does offer many additional insights)
I join others (I'm sure) in thanking Tony for the incredible resource that is the digital fire library, and for the insight glaze calculation software and now website. Not a week goes by when I don't use all three of them and usually quite extensively.
What would we do without you?!??!
Your site is the most useful of them all for material info. and more. Thank you.
Tony, you're a gentleman and a scholar. Thanks for the information. I'm a self-taught potter living in Hansville, WA. could not have done it without your scientific approach and papers.
I've really appreciated using your insight-live.com software.
Let me begin by saying thank you! The resource you have provided is immensely valuable! Ive learned more from your website than I did during grad school.. jokes on me. Thank you for everything!
Oct 22, 2026: We are working on protecting our servers against the PHP2Shell vulnerability recently discovered. Servers were upgraded ahead of schedule on Oct 21. This could cause some issues. Please contact us if you encounter any.
Practical posts like these. No ads or tracking. The first email will provide one-click unsubscribe. Please subscribe inside your insight-live.com account or email me.
Blog
Frits are melting before the carbon has been expelled
These G1916Q and G1916J low fire clear glazes contain 85% frit and 15% kaolin, so they begin to soften as low as 1450F. I made these 10 gram GBMF test balls to compare the degree of melting across a broad range. I did not expect to see carbon or the degree to which these balls could trap it. Notice that unoxidized carbon is still obvious at 1650F, still visible at 1750F and leaves the residual effect of micro-bubbles that opacify the matrix even at 1950F (cone 04). While a thin layer of these glazes on ware will most often tolerate this anyway, when bubble clouds do appear an option is to hold the firing at 1400F to fire away as much of the carbon as possible (before melting begins).
Redart has been so reliable over the years that many have just trusted it. But it is a high-iron terracotta clay. This is ceramics; we've just been lucky. Such materials are variable by nature.
While many clay body makers put Redart into their products as soon as it arrives, Freddie doesn't do that. He notes the batch code(s), takes multiple samples, and makes SHAB test bars. He even mixes up a test body and makes ware and test bars from it too. He has a well-developed testing program and knows Redart well. Freddie also understands the recipes it is used in. The low-temperature bodies depend on its iron content for their red color (he is ready to adjust the iron oxide percentage in recipes). But Freddie has to be really diligent with stoneware bodies that also depend on Redart for fired maturity, being ready to adjust their recipes (to increase or reduce the degree of vitrification).
The "Q" in the code number signifies that it was preceded by tests A, B, C, ... P; thus, it is the product of a lot of work to develop a flexible recipe that anyone can make and adjust. This could be your path into low-fire pottery.
The photo shows G1916Q on L215, L212, L210, L213, Buffstone at cone 03. It uses common Ferro frits and can be made to fit any low-fire clay body (it is thermal expansionCOE adjustable). It melts well down to cone 05. And we have a strategy to reduce clouding and micro-bubbling. These five test tiles were fired using the 04DSDH (drop-and-hold) firing schedule. All exited the kiln without crazing. The L215, L213, L210 and L212 samples subsequently survived a 300F/Icewater test without crazing, but the Buffstone did not (reduce its COE by increasing Frit 3249 and reducing Frit 3110, e.g. 15:5 instead of 10:10). The L213 could shiver (increase COE by increasing Frit 3110 at the expense of Frit 3249).
These two GBMF test balls were melted on refractory tiles to compare their melting behaviour. Their calculated oxide chemistries are almost identical, but their recipes are very different. G2931F (left) contains 29% Ulexite, driving its calculated LOI to 14.3%. G2931K (right) sources its boron from frits, reducing the LOI to just 3.1%. The difference is striking! The high-LOI glaze is full of large bubbles that were unable to escape or clear before the melt stiffened during cooling. Although ulexite releases most of its chemically bound water before significant glaze melting, that early gas evolution can contribute to foaming and trapped bubbles as melting progresses. The fritted glaze is much clearer, although it still contains fine bubbles. These may be associated with the kaolin or other sources of entrained gas.
The GBMF test exaggerates gas-retention behaviour, which is precisely why it is useful for comparing recipes, but it does not necessarily predict the appearance of a thin glaze layer on ware.
This is G1916Q3, a version of G1916Q with added 45-micron-grade silica, fired at cone 04. Despite the extra silica and low firing temperature, the glaze remains glossy, transparent and well melted. The finer powder promotes dissolution into the melt, where the added silica can improve chemical durability. Notice the shivering at the right-hand rim of this PlainsmanL215 mug. The encouraging part is that the recipe provides a straightforward way to raise its thermal expansion: replace some low-expansionFrit 3249 with high-expansionFrit 3110, then retest.
For stoneware potters exploring low fire, a recipe like this offers a practical starting point and a clear way to make adjustments. It can be opacified with zircon, colored with compatible stains, and prepared for dipping or brushing. This surface shows how much brilliance and clarity are possible at cone 04. Fire to cone 02 and you have stoneware.
Frit manufacturers face a daunting challenge: Converting carbonates, hydrates, borates, and nitrate materials, which off-gas during firing, into a homogeneous melt, quenching to a glass of zero LOI and then grinding that back into a consistent powder. You face a challenge also.
Shown here is a GLFL test that reveals a combination of improper mixing and inadequate smelting. This melt fluidity test compares the previous good shipment, L, with the latest faulty one, S. S appears to have not been fully reacted during manufacture (as exhibited by the foam blanket). But there’s more: a glaze containing 50% of this had inadequate melting. That could be chemical drift or inadequate batch mixing. The latter seems most likely because S was from a full two-pallet batch (the likely capacity of their smelter), from which a dozen bags were tested. These showed the most typical results at the top of the first pallet and the worst at the bottom of the second.
A bad batch of frit can ruin a lot of ware. Buy the largest amount you can afford and do the GBMF test is almost as good as these. Character changes in the melted balls put up the red flags you need to see.
This cone 6 vase was made from a coarse-grained stoneware body typical of those long produced by Plainsman Clays. These materials performed well at cone 10 reduction, but when similar bodies began being fired at cone 6 oxidation, pinholing often became a challenge. Why? The coarser particle structure creates fewer but larger pathways for escaping decomposition gases, concentrating gas flow through localized vents and leaving behind pits like those visible here. The gas is generated from fewer larger particles, concentrating it.
Yet today many potters fire these same clays with little or no pinholing. Electronic kiln controllers deserve much of the credit, making drop-and-hold and slow-cool schedules practical. Equally important are glazes with enough melt fluidity to heal LOI gas-release craters during the hold, while maintaining sufficiently low surface tension to avoid trapping gases in bubbles that later become blisters. Commercial glaze manufacturers have quietly optimized for these same properties.
A test kiln turns “What if?” into “Let’s find out”
You don’t have to invent a glaze from scratch to start making glazes your own. Begin with a documented recipe, make one controlled change and compare the results. This is G3933, made by adding iron oxide, rutile and tin oxide to a 75:25 blend of G2934 matte and G2926B glossy base glazes. I like it—but this mug gives me plenty of reasons to keep testing:
Crawling
The glaze has crawled at some sharp edges of the incised decoration. Would a small CMC gum addition help it adhere better during drying?Matteness
Would changing the matte-to-glossy blend from 75:25 to 80:20 give the surface a little more matteness?Firing
What would the C5DHSC slow-cooling schedule do to the color and surface? How would those results compare on a red-burning clay?Additives
What would separate increases in rutile, iron oxide or granular manganese do to the variegation, color and speckling?Different base
How would the same colorants behave in a Ravenscrag Slip base glaze?
A small test kiln makes these questions practical to investigate. I can fire a few samples when I need to, compare each change with the original and use what I learn to decide the next step.
The kaolin is implicated in this glaze crawling problem. 30% EPK is a lot - a tipping point for issues with shrinkage and cracking on drying. Although #6 Tile kaolin in its place (center) doesn't disrupt the overall chemistry, it does disrupt the drying shrinkage: it is just too plastic for that high a percentage in a recipe. The fix is to substitute part of it for calcined kaolin.
Calcined kaolin has no LOI (vs 12% for raw kaolins). Without overthinking it, LOI-adjust by considering that 10% less is needed. So 20% #6 Tile and 9% calcined kaolin will equal 30% EPK. The right panel shows the calculated chemistry of the recipe with this change; notice it is very close to the same.
There are other fix options also. NZ and Grolleg kaolins are less plastic choices than #6 Tile; using either might mean that no calcined material is needed. Also, the failure happened on multi-layering of dipping glazes; crawling is common with that. The base glaze could have been mixed as a base-coat dipping glaze.
It only takes her two seconds. But those two seconds are packed with details. To a typical potter, it might seem that this factory worker is doing the impossible. Although she is just dipping plates, there is so much going on here we need to stop and itemize it. There is more than one thing a potter can learn from this. Click/tap the URL below to see the video and learn more.